BBS in a Box 5

home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search

/ BBS in a Box 5 / BBS in a Box -Volume V (BBS in a Box) (April 1992).iso / Files / Prog / M / MPWGCC (Misc).cpt / Bison / Documents / Info / bison.info-3 < prev next >

Wrap

Text File | 1989-05-30 | 48.4 KB | 1,302 lines | [TEXT/MPS ]

Info file bison.info, produced by Makeinfo, -*- Text -*- from input file bison.texinfo. This file documents the Bison parser generator. Copyright (C) 1988, 1989 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are preserved on all copies. Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided also that the sections entitled ``GNU General Public License'' and ``Conditions for Using Bison'' are included exactly as in the original, and provided that the entire resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a permission notice identical to this one. Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this manual into another language, under the above conditions for modified versions, except that the sections entitled ``GNU General Public License'', ``Conditions for Using Bison'' and this permission notice may be included in translations approved by the Free Software Foundation instead of in the original English. File: bison.info, Node: Multiple Parsers, Prev: Declarations, Up: Grammar File Multiple Parsers in the Same Program ==================================== Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language with the same program? Here is what you must do: * Make each parser a pure parser (*note Pure Decl::.). This gets rid of global variables such as `yylval' which would otherwise conflict between the various parsers, but it requires an alternate calling convention for `yylex' (*note Pure Calling::.). * In each grammar file, define `yyparse' as a macro, expanding into the name you want for that parser. Put this definition in the C declarations section (*note C Declarations::.). For example: %{ #define yyparse parse_algol %} Then use the expanded name `parse_algol' in other source files to call this parser. * If you want different lexical analyzers for each grammar, you can define `yylex' as a macro, just like `yyparse'. Use the expanded name when you define `yylex' in another source file. If you define `yylex' in the grammar file itself, simply make it static, like this: %{ static int yylex (); %} %% ... GRAMMAR RULES ... %% static int yylex (yylvalp, yyllocp) YYSTYPE *yylvalp; YYLTYPE *yyllocp; { ... } * If you want a different `yyerror' function for each grammar, you can use the same methods that work for `yylex'. File: bison.info, Node: Interface, Next: Algorithm, Prev: Grammar File, Up: Top Parser C-Language Interface *************************** The Bison parser is actually a C function named `yyparse'. Here we describe the interface conventions of `yyparse' and the other functions that it needs to use. Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with `yy' and `YY' for internal purposes. If you use such an identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in additional C code in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble. * Menu: * Parser Function:: How to call `yyparse' and what it returns. * Lexical:: You must supply a function `yylex' which reads tokens. * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function `yyerror'. * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions. File: bison.info, Node: Parser Function, Next: Lexical, Prev: Interface, Up: Interface The Parser Function `yyparse' ============================= You call the function `yyparse' to cause parsing to occur. This function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also write an action which directs `yyparse' to return immediately without reading further. The value returned by `yyparse' is 0 if parsing was successful (return is due to end-of-input). The value is 1 if parsing failed (return is due to a syntax error). In an action, you can cause immediate return from `yyparse' by using these macros: `YYACCEPT' Return immediately with value 0 (to report success). `YYABORT' Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure). File: bison.info, Node: Lexical, Next: Error Reporting, Prev: Parser Function, Up: Interface The Lexical Analyzer Function `yylex' ===================================== The "lexical analyzer" function, `yylex', recognizes tokens from the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create this function automatically; you must write it so that `yyparse' can call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner. In simple programs, `yylex' is often defined at the end of the Bison grammar file. If `yylex' is defined in a separate source file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be available there. To do this, use the `-d' option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into a separate header file `NAME.tab.h' which you can include in the other source files that need it. *Note Invocation::. * Menu: * Calling Convention:: How `yyparse' calls `yylex'. * Token Values:: How `yylex' must return the semantic value of the token it has read. * Token Positions:: How `yylex' must return the text position (line number, etc.) of the token, if the actions want that. * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser (*note Pure Decl::.). File: bison.info, Node: Calling Convention, Next: Token Values, Prev: Lexical, Up: Lexical Calling Convention for `yylex' ------------------------------ The value that `yylex' returns must be the numeric code for the type of token it has just found, or 0 for end-of-input. When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name in the parser file becomes a C macro whose definition is the proper numeric code for that token type. So `yylex' can use the name to indicate that type. *Note Symbols::. When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal, the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type. So `yylex' can simply return that character code. The null character must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that is what signifies end-of-input. Here is an example showing these things: yylex() { ... if (c == EOF) /* Detect end of file. */ return 0; ... if (c == '+' || c == '-') return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */ ... return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */ ... } This interface has been designed so that the output from the `lex' utility can be used without change as the definition of `yylex'. File: bison.info, Node: Token Values, Next: Token Positions, Prev: Calling Convention, Up: Lexical Returning Semantic Values of Tokens ----------------------------------- In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must be stored into the global variable `yylval'. When you are using just one data type for semantic values, `yylval' has that type. Thus, if the type is `int' (the default), you might write this in `yylex': ... yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */ return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */ ... When you are using multiple data types, `yylval''s type is a union made from the `%union' declaration (*note Union Decl::.). So when you store a token's value, you must use the proper member of the union. If the `%union' declaration looks like this: %union { int intval; double val; symrec *tptr; } then the code in `yylex' might look like this: ... yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */ return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */ ... File: bison.info, Node: Token Positions, Next: Pure Calling, Prev: Token Values, Up: Lexical Reporting Textual Positions of Tokens ------------------------------------- If you are using the `@N'-feature (*note Action Features::.) in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings, then you must provide this information in `yylex'. The function `yyparse' expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed in the global variable `yylloc'. So `yylex' must store the proper data in that variable. The value of `yylloc' is a structure and you need only initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The four members are called `first_line', `first_column', `last_line' and `last_column'. Note that the use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower. The data type of `yylloc' has the name `YYLTYPE'. File: bison.info, Node: Pure Calling, Prev: Token Positions, Up: Lexical Calling Convention for Pure Parsers ----------------------------------- When you use the Bison declaration `%pure_parser' to request a pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables `yylval' and `yylloc' cannot be used. (*Note Pure Decl::.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by pointers passed as arguments to `yylex'. You must declare them as shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those pointers. yylex (lvalp, llocp) YYSTYPE *lvalp; YYLTYPE *llocp; { ... *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */ return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */ ... } File: bison.info, Node: Error Reporting, Next: Action Features, Prev: Lexical, Up: Interface The Error Reporting Function `yyerror' ====================================== The Bison parser detects a "parse error" or "syntax error" whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. A action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the macro `YYERROR' (*note Action Features::.). The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error reporting function named `yyerror', which you must supply. It is called by `yyparse' whenever a syntax error is found, and it receives one argument. For a parse error, the string is always `"parse error"'. The parser can detect one other kind of error: stack overflow. This happens when the input contains constructions that are very deeply nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison parser extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But if overflow happens, `yyparse' calls `yyerror' in the usual fashion, except that the argument string is `"parser stack overflow"'. The following definition suffices in simple programs: yyerror (s) char *s; { fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s); } After `yyerror' returns to `yyparse', the latter will attempt error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules (*note Error Recovery::.). If recovery is impossible, `yyparse' will immediately return 1. The variable `yynerrs' contains the number of syntax errors encountered so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you request a pure parser (*note Pure Decl::.) then it is a local variable which only the actions can access. File: bison.info, Node: Action Features, Prev: Error Reporting, Up: Interface Special Features for Use in Actions =================================== Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that are useful in actions. `$$' Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. *Note Actions::. `$N' Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the Nth component of the current rule. *Note Actions::. `$<TYPEALT>$' Like `$$' but specifies alternative TYPEALT in the union specified by the `%union' declaration. *Note Action Types::. `$<TYPEALT>N' Like `$N' but specifies alternative TYPEALT in the union specified by the `%union' declaration. *Note Action Types::. `YYABORT;' Return immediately from `yyparse', indicating failure. *Note Parser Function::. `YYACCEPT;' Return immediately from `yyparse', indicating success. *Note Parser Function::. `YYEMPTY' Value stored in `yychar' when there is no look-ahead token. `YYERROR;' Cause an immediate syntax error. This causes `yyerror' to be called, and then error recovery begins. *Note Error Recovery::. `yychar' Variable containing the current look-ahead token. (In a pure parser, this is actually a local variable within `yyparse'.) When there is no look-ahead token, the value `YYERROR' is stored here. *Note Look-Ahead::. `yyclearin;' Discard the current look-ahead token. This is useful primarily in error rules. *Note Error Recovery::. `yyerrok;' Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax errors. This is useful primarily in error rules. *Note Error Recovery::. `@N' Acts like a structure variable containing information on the line numbers and column numbers of the Nth component of the current rule. The structure has four members, like this: struct { int first_line, last_line; int first_column, last_column; }; Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, use `@3.first_line'. In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information, you must make `yylex' supply this information about each token. If you need only certain members, then `yylex' need only fill in those members. The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower. File: bison.info, Node: Algorithm, Next: Error Recovery, Prev: Interface, Up: Top The Algorithm of the Bison Parser ********************************* As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their semantic values. The stack is called the "parser stack". Pushing a token is traditionally called "shifting". For example, suppose the infix calculator has read `1 + 5 *', with a `3' to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token that was shifted. But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When the last N tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called "reduction". Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule. Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping. For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this: 1 + 5 * 3 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule: expr: expr '*' expr; Then the stack contains just these three elements: 1 + 15 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value 16. Then the newline token can be shifted. The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol (*note Language and Grammar::.). This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser. * Menu: * Look-Ahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do. * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid. * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts. * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context. * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack. * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation. File: bison.info, Node: Look-Ahead, Next: Shift/Reduce, Prev: Algorithm, Up: Algorithm Look-Ahead Tokens ================= The Bison parser does *not* always reduce immediately as soon as the last N tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next token in order to decide what to do. When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the "look-ahead token", which is not on the stack. Now the parser can perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while the look-ahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions should take place, the look-ahead token is shifted onto the stack. This does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the token type of the look-ahead token, some rules may choose to delay their application. Here is a simple case where look-ahead is needed. These three rules define expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary factorial operators (`!'), and allow parentheses for grouping. expr: term '+' expr | term ; term: '(' expr ')' | term '!' | NUMBER ; Suppose that the tokens `1 + 2' have been read and shifted; what should be done? If the following token is `)', then the first three tokens must be reduced to form an `expr'. This is the only valid course, because shifting the `)' would produce a sequence of symbols `term ')'', and no rule allows this. If the following token is `!', then it must be shifted immediately so that `2 !' can be reduced to make a `term'. If instead the parser were to reduce before shifting, `1 + 2' would become an `expr'. It would then be impossible to shift the `!' because doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols `expr '!''. No rule allows that sequence. The current look-ahead token is stored in the variable `yychar'. *Note Action Features::. File: bison.info, Node: Shift/Reduce, Next: Precedence, Prev: Look-Ahead, Up: Algorithm Shift/Reduce Conflicts ====================== Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else statements, with a pair of rules like this: if_stmt: IF expr THEN stmt | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt ; (Here we assume that `IF', `THEN' and `ELSE' are terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.) When the `ELSE' token is read and becomes the look-ahead token, the contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the `ELSE', because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second rule. This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is called a "shift/reduce conflict". Bison is designed to resolve these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's contrast it with the other alternative. Since the parser prefers to shift the `ELSE', the result is to attach the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs equivalent: if x then if y then win(); else lose; if x then do; if y then win(); else lose; end; But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement, making these two inputs equivalent: if x then if y then win(); else lose; if x then do; if y then win(); end; else lose; The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.) This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling `else''' ambiguity. To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce conflicts, use the `%expect N' declaration. There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts is exactly N. *Note Expect Decl::. File: bison.info, Node: Precedence, Next: Contextual Precedence, Prev: Shift/Reduce, Up: Algorithm Operator Precedence =================== Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to shift and when to reduce. * Menu: * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed. * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars. * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example. * How Precedence:: How they work. File: bison.info, Node: Why Precedence, Next: Using Precedence, Prev: Precedence, Up: Precedence When Precedence is Needed ------------------------- Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the input `1 - 2 * 3' can be parsed in two different ways): expr: expr '-' expr | expr '*' expr | expr '<' expr | '(' expr ')' ... ; Suppose the parser has seen the tokens `1', `-' and `2'; should it reduce them via the rule for the addition operator? It depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is `)', we must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the token sequence `- 2 )' or anything starting with that. But if the next token is `*' or `<', we have a choice: either shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with different results. To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If the next operator token OP is shifted, then it must be reduced first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the sum. The result is (in effect) `1 - (2 OP 3)'. On the other hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting OP, the result is `(1 - 2) OP 3'. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators `-' and OP: `*' should be shifted first, but not `<'. What about input like `1 - 2 - 5'; should this be `(1 - 2) - 5' or `1 - (2 - 5)'? For most operators we prefer the former, which is called "left association". The latter alternative, "right association", is desirable for assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack contains `1 - 2' and the look-ahead token is `-': shifting makes right-associativity. File: bison.info, Node: Using Precedence, Next: Precedence Examples, Prev: Why Precedence, Up: Precedence How to Specify Operator Precedence ---------------------------------- Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence declarations `%left' and `%right'. Each such declaration contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and associativity is being declared. The `%left' declaration makes all those operators left-associative and the `%right' declaration makes them right-associative. A third alternative is `%nonassoc', which declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a row''. The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the order in which they are declared. The first `%left' or `%right' declaration declares the operators whose precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators whose precedence is a little higher, and so on. File: bison.info, Node: Precedence Examples, Next: How Precedence, Prev: Using Precedence, Up: Precedence Precedence Examples ------------------- In our example, we would want the following declarations: %left '<' %left '-' %left '*' In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, `'+'' is declared with `'-'': %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE %left '+' '-' %left '*' '/' (Here `NE' and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal'' and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.) File: bison.info, Node: How Precedence, Prev: Precedence Examples, Up: Precedence How Precedence Works -------------------- The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. *Note Contextual Precedence::.) Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence of the rule being considered with that of the look-ahead token. If the token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that precedence level. The verbose output file made by `-v' (*note Invocation::.) says how each conflict was resolved. Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or the look-ahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift. File: bison.info, Node: Contextual Precedence, Next: Parser States, Prev: Precedence, Up: Algorithm Operators with Context-Dependent Precedence =========================================== Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator. The Bison precedence declarations, `%left', `%right' and `%nonassoc', can only be used once for a given token; so a token has only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the `%prec' modifier for rules. The `%prec' modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by specifying a terminal symbol whose predecence should be used for that rule. It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The modifier's syntax is: %prec TERMINAL-SYMBOL and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to assign the rule the precedence of TERMINAL-SYMBOL, overriding the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule are resolved (*note Precedence::.). Here is how `%prec' solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named `UMINUS'. There are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its precedence: ... %left '+' '-' %left '*' %left UMINUS Now the precedence of `UMINUS' can be used in specific rules: exp: ... | exp '-' exp ... | '-' exp %prec UMINUS File: bison.info, Node: Parser States, Next: Reduce/Reduce, Prev: Contextual Precedence, Up: Algorithm Parser States ============= The function `yyparse' is implemented using a finite-state machine. The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next. Each time a look-ahead token is read, the current parser state together with the type of look-ahead token are looked up in a table. This table entry can say, ``Shift the look-ahead token.'' In this case, it also specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number N.'' This means that a certain of tokens or groupings are taken off the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words, that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is pushed. There is one other alternative: the table can say that the look-ahead token is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin (*note Error Recovery::.). File: bison.info, Node: Reduce/Reduce, Prev: Parser States, Up: Algorithm Reduce/Reduce conflicts ======================= A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error in the grammar. For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence of zero or more `word' groupings. sequence: /* empty */ { printf ("empty sequence\n"); } | word { printf ("single word %s\n", $1); } | sequence word { printf ("added word %s\n", $2); } ; The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single `word' into a `sequence'. It could be reduced directly via the second rule. Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a `sequence' via the first rule, and this could be combined with the `word' using the third rule. You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action. In this example, the output of the program changes. Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the proper way to define `sequence': sequence: /* empty */ { printf ("empty sequence\n"); } | sequence word { printf ("added word %s\n", $2); } ; Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict: sequence: /* empty */ | sequence words | sequence redirects ; words: /* empty */ | words word ; redirects:/* empty */ | redirects redirect ; The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either `word' or `redirect' groupings. The individual definitions of `sequence', `words' and `redirects' are error-free, but the three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed in infinitely many ways! Consider: nothing-at-all could be a `words'. Or it could be two `words' in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a `redirects', or two, or any number. Or it could be a `words' followed by three `redirects' and another `words'. And so on. Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level of sequence: sequence: /* empty */ | sequence word | sequence redirect ; Second, to prevent either a `words' or a `redirects' from being empty: sequence: /* empty */ | sequence words | sequence redirects ; words: word | words word ; redirects:redirect | redirects redirect ; File: bison.info, Node: Error Recovery, Next: Context Dependency, Prev: Algorithm, Up: Top Error Recovery ************** It is not usually acceptable to have the program terminate on a parse error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept another expression. In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may be sufficient to allow `yyparse' to return 1 on error and have the caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call `yyparse' again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file. You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to recognize the special token `error'. This is a terminal symbol that is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error handling. The Bison parser generates an `error' token whenever a syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token in the current context, the parse can continue. For example: stmnts: /* empty string */ | stmnts '\n' | stmnts exp '\n' | stmnts error '\n' The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline makes a valid addition to any `stmnts'. What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an `exp'? The error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence of a `stmnts', an `error' and a newline. If an error occurs in the middle of an `exp', there will probably be some additional tokens and subexpressions on the stack after the last `stmnts', and there will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not applicable in the ordinary way. But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the `error' token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete `stmnts'.) At this point the `error' token can be shifted. Then, if the old look-ahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so that the fourth rule can apply. The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of the current input line or current statement if an error is detected: stmnt: error ';' /* on error, skip until ';' is read */ It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another, spurious error message: primary: '(' expr ')' | '(' error ')' ... ; Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong, one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one `stmnt'. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the middle of a valid `stmnt'. After the error recovery rule recovers from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway, since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid `stmnt'. To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will error messages resume. Note that rules which accept the `error' token may have actions, just as any other rules can. You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro `yyerrok' in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments; `yyerrok;' is a valid C statement. The previous look-ahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If this is unacceptable, then the macro `yyclearin' may be used to clear this token. Write the statement `yyclearin;' in the error rule's action. For example, suppose that on a parse error, an error handling routine is called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is probably correct. The previous look-ahead token ought to be discarded with `yyclearin;'. File: bison.info, Node: Context Dependency, Next: Debugging, Prev: Error Recovery, Up: Top Handling Context Dependencies ***************************** The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques (known as "kludges") may enable you to write Bison parsers for such languages. * Menu: * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context. * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context. * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how error recovery rules must be written. (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is neither clean nor robust.) File: bison.info, Node: Semantic Tokens, Next: Lexical Tie-ins, Prev: Context Dependency, Up: Context Dependency Semantic Info in Token Types ============================ The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this: foo (x); This looks like a function call statement, but if `foo' is a typedef name, then this is actually a declaration of `x'. How can a Bison parser for C decide how to parse this input? The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types, `IDENTIFIER' and `TYPENAME'. When `yylex' finds an identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order to decide which token type to return: `TYPENAME' if the identifier is declared as a typedef, `IDENTIFIER' otherwise. The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of token type to recognize. `IDENTIFIER' is accepted as an expression, but `TYPENAME' is not. `TYPENAME' can start a declaration, but `IDENTIFIER' cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier is *not* significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a typedef name, either `TYPENAME' or `IDENTIFIER' is accepted--there is one rule for each of the two token types. This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified earlier: typedef int foo, bar, lose; static foo (bar); /* redeclare `bar' as static variable */ static int foo (lose); /* redeclare `foo' as function */ Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure--the ``declarator''. As a result, the part of Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the duplication, with actions omitted for brevity: initdcl: declarator maybeasm '=' init | declarator maybeasm ; notype_initdcl: notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init | notype_declarator maybeasm ; Here `initdcl' can redeclare a typedef name, but `notype_initdcl' cannot. The distinction between `declarator' and `notype_declarator' is the same sort of thing. There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by the syntactic context. File: bison.info, Node: Lexical Tie-ins, Next: Tie-in Recovery, Prev: Semantic Tokens, Up: Context Dependency Lexical Tie-ins =============== One way to handle context-dependency is the "lexical tie-in": a flag which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are parsed. For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special construct `hex (HEX-EXPR)'. After the keyword `hex' comes an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In particular, the token `a1b' must be treated as an integer rather than as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it: %{ int hexflag; %} %% ... expr: IDENTIFIER | constant | HEX '(' { hexflag = 1; } expr ')' { hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; } | expr '+' expr { $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); } ... ; constant: INTEGER | STRING ; Here we assume that `yylex' looks at the value of `hexflag'; when it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting with letters are parsed as integers if possible. The declaration of `hexflag' shown in the C declarations section of the parser file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (*note C Declarations::.). You must also write the code in `yylex' to obey the flag. File: bison.info, Node: Tie-in Recovery, Prev: Lexical Tie-ins, Up: Context Dependency Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery ================================== Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have. *Note Error Recovery::. The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct. For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this: stmt: expr ';' | IF '(' expr ')' stmt { ... } ... error ';' { hexflag = 0; } ; If there is a syntax error in the middle of a `hex (EXPR)' construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the completed `hex (EXPR)' will never run. So `hexflag' would remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next `hex' keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers. To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears `hexflag'. There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions. For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses and skips to the close-parenthesis: expr: ... | '(' expr ')' { $$ = $2; } | '(' error ')' ... If this rule acts within the `hex' construct, it is not going to abort that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of the `hex' construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect. What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the `hex' construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no way you can write the action to determine whether a `hex' construct is being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to clear the flag. File: bison.info, Node: Debugging, Next: Invocation, Prev: Context Dependency, Up: Top Debugging Your Parser ********************* If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it runs, the `yydebug' parser-trace feature can help you figure out why. To enable compilation of trace facilities, you must define the macro `YYDEBUG' when you compile the parser. You could use `-DYYDEBUG' as a compiler option or you could put `#define YYDEBUG' in the C declarations section of the grammar file (*note C Declarations::.). Alternatively, use the `-t' option when you run Bison (*note Invocation::.). I always define `YYDEBUG' so that debugging is always possible. The trace facility uses `stderr', so you must add `#include <stdio.h>' to the C declarations section unless it is already there. Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable `yydebug'. You can do this by making the C code do it (in `main', perhaps), or you can alter the value with a C debugger. Each step taken by the parser when `yydebug' is nonzero produces a line or two of trace information, written on `stderr'. The trace messages tell you these things: * Each time the parser calls `yylex', what kind of token was read. * Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the state stack (*note Parser States::.). * Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents of the state stack afterward. To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file produced by the Bison `-v' option (*note Invocation::.). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the grammar are to blame. The parser file is a C program and you can use C debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values of variables show where in the grammar it is working. File: bison.info, Node: Invocation, Next: Table of Symbols, Prev: Debugging, Up: Top Invocation of Bison; Command Options ************************************ The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows: bison INFILE Here INFILE is the grammar file name, which usually ends in `.y'. The parser file's name is made by replacing the `.y' with `.tab.c'. Thus, `bison foo.y' outputs `foo.tab.c'. These options can be used with Bison: `-d' Write an extra output file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in the grammar and the semantic value type `YYSTYPE', as well as a few `extern' variable declarations. If the parser output file is named `NAME.c' then this file is named `NAME.h'. This output file is essential if you wish to put the definition of `yylex' in a separate source file, because `yylex' needs to be able to refer to token type codes and the variable `yylval'. *Note Token Values::. `-l' Don't put any `#line' preprocessor commands in the parser file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser file so that the C compiler and debuggers will associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option causes them to associate errors with the parser file, treating it an independent source file in its own right. `-o OUTFILE' Specify the name OUTFILE for the parser file. The other output files' names are constructed from OUTFILE as described under the `-v' and `-d' switches. `-t' Output a definition of the macro `YYDEBUG' into the parser file, so that the debugging facilities are compiled. *Note Debugging::. `-v' Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the parser states and what is done for each type of look-ahead token in that state. This file also describes all the conflicts, both those resolved by operator precedence and the unresolved ones. The file's name is made by removing `.tab.c' or `.c' from the parser output file name, and adding `.output' instead. Therefore, if the input file is `foo.y', then the parser file is called `foo.tab.c' by default. As a consequence, the verbose output file is called `foo.output'. `-y' Equivalent to `-o y.tab.c'; the parser output file is called `y.tab.c', and the other outputs are called `y.output' and `y.tab.h'. The purpose of this switch is to imitate Yacc's output file name conventions.